Direct answer
Before using AI for a research project, define the question, source standards, privacy boundaries, acceptable use, citation needs, verification process and output purpose. AI can speed organisation and comparison, but it can also produce confident errors, weak synthesis or unsupported claims if review rules are vague.
Why it matters
This answer keeps human accountability visible in AI-assisted work. It should help readers separate source-grounded claims, useful inferences, review thresholds, unsupported output and decisions that still need human judgement.
What to check
- Which claims are source-derived, inferred, assumed or unsupported?
- What review threshold applies?
- Who owns the final judgement before publication or client use?
Common mistake
Mistaking fluent AI output for grounded, reviewed and accountable work.
Caveats
Medium caveat risk: use careful wording and recheck current, technical, platform, service-scope or public-account claims before publication. Keep the answer framed as guidance rather than a guarantee.