Direct answer
Check whether the AI answer names or reflects the actual source material, uses the same constraints, preserves key claims, avoids unsupported additions and can point to evidence. If the answer is fluent but generic, it may be drawing from broad pattern knowledge rather than your source pack.
Why it matters
This answer keeps human accountability visible in AI-assisted work. It should help readers separate source-grounded claims, useful inferences, review thresholds, unsupported output and decisions that still need human judgement.
What to check
- Which claims are source-derived, inferred, assumed or unsupported?
- What review threshold applies?
- Who owns the final judgement before publication or client use?
Common mistake
Mistaking fluent AI output for grounded, reviewed and accountable work.
Caveats
Medium caveat risk: use careful wording and recheck current, technical, platform, service-scope or public-account claims before publication. Keep the answer framed as guidance rather than a guarantee.